Title: Former Conservative Judge Urges Supreme Court to Exclude Trump from Ballot
Washington D.C. – In a recent development, former conservative federal appellate judge J. Michael Luttig has urged the Supreme Court to bar former President Donald Trump from future elections. Luttig argues that Trump’s efforts to cling to power after the 2020 election were more significant than South Carolina’s secession that triggered the Civil War.
Luttig claims that Trump’s actions were an attempt to prevent President Biden from governing anywhere in the United States, inciting an armed insurrection against the Constitution. The former judge has been a prominent conservative voice calling for Trump’s disqualification from holding office.
Luttig played a pivotal role in the battle over the certification of the 2020 presidential election. He provided legal ammunition to Vice President Mike Pence, aiding his defiance against Trump’s attempt to overturn the election results. Now, the US Supreme Court has agreed to review the decision made by the Colorado Supreme Court that removed Trump from the state’s ballot.
The Colorado Supreme Court concluded that Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021, rendered him constitutionally ineligible to run in 2024. Oral arguments in the case are scheduled to be heard on February 8, bringing the high-stakes issue to the forefront.
Notably, several prominent lawyers, including conservative attorney George Conway, have submitted a brief urging the Supreme Court to consider the matter through a textualist lens. The brief argues that the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” can be enforced by courts, not only by Congress after a candidate is elected.
The argument put forth by Trump, if successful, could potentially deprive voters of an informed decision and introduce chaos in determining a disqualified President. The brief emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting Section 3 of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, considering its historical significance.
Legal experts, including CNN contributors Jamie Gangel and Ariane de Vogue, have weighed in on the case. Their analysis lends further credibility to the notion that the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision could have far-reaching implications for the future of American democracy.
As the nation awaits the outcome of this landmark case, America’s political landscape hangs in the balance. The verdict reached by the Supreme Court will undoubtedly shape the course of the upcoming 2024 presidential election and have a lasting impact on the boundaries of executive power.
About The Puck Drop:
The Puck Drop is a leading news website dedicated to covering current events, politics, and legal developments in the United States. With a team of experienced journalists and experts, The Puck Drop aims to provide unbiased and insightful reporting on issues that matter most to Americans.
